Envestnet Whitepapers

Fee-Only vs. Subscription-Based Pricing: Trends and Technology's Impact

Issue link: https://resources.envestnet.com/i/1528389

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 8

Billing is more than just asset-based fees While asset-based fees make up most of the revenue for firms involved in portfolio management, fee-only planners bill for their services instead, regardless of the client's investments. Some firms charge a performance-based fee or charge for services on an a la carte basis. There are also different structures to consider, whether hourly, flat, tiered, or by class. Billing can become complicated and time-consuming, especially when the firm's billing platform requires a significant amount of human involvement. Which billing platform a firm chooses is as important as their CRM, portfolio management, or financial planning software. The more time advisors spend mired in administrative work, the less time they spend helping clients or seeking new business. With most advisors already struggling to manage their workloads in a typical 40-hour work week 13 , inefficient billing software makes matters worse. Some of the best billing solutions automate much of this process. Fee model type 12 AUM 62% 40% Flat 18% Hourly 14% Annual/Retainer 6% Subscription 6 © 2024 ENVESTNET, INC. FOR HOME OFFICE AND ADVISOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC.

Articles in this issue

view archives of Envestnet Whitepapers - Fee-Only vs. Subscription-Based Pricing: Trends and Technology's Impact